[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:51:13 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:37:32PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
[...]
> > o - They must, like Emacs, be fully usable on a text console without a
> > mouse as well as in X. There are at least 3 hackers here who prefer
> > such a setup.
>
> This *does* have a technical solution: lynx. Or links. Text-mode
> browsers aren't what I'd call pleasant compared to graphical ones, but
> they are usable.
I have to take issue with this last one. Whereas I'm far from 'console
bigot' (I do enjoy Emacs on X far more than on console), I cringe when I
have to use those badly done, Javascript and cookie-laden Web-2.0
interfaces. Trac -- ackphth.
GUI != browser. And I think we'd be better off separating all those
layers and picking whatever suits us. Why not http without html? Or html
without Javascript? Texinfo-over-http anyone?
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHe1CBBcgs9XrR2kYRAv7eAJ4yVuwhJHcnrufo5DUHrMg6X+mKeQCdFt5F
V5wPIU6NVEg0xSaRr16uu0I=
=cFNy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, (continued)
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, John S. Yates, Jr., 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/03
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like,
tomas <=
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Romain Francoise, 2008/01/01
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/01