[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:17 -0500 |
Speaking from experience on multiple projects, a pernicious CVS
effect is to install a reluctance to rename. This is tantamount
to banning any large scale refactoring. And that is ultimately
extremely damaging to a long-lived code base under truly active
development.
I agree that this is a drawback of CVS, but in Emacs we have
not let it stop us from moving files around. We've done
substantial amounts of that recently.
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, (continued)
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/01
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Tassilo Horn, 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, John S. Yates, Jr., 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, tomas, 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Romain Francoise, 2008/01/01
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/01