[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: question about `quit-char'
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: question about `quit-char' |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:13:45 -0700 |
> >> So I think this feature should be removed....
> >
> > I do. I don't see why we should remove one of the oldest
> > features in Emacs, just because it's complicated to use it.
> > Certainly not now.
>
> Okay. I didn't realize that current-input-mode has been
> around for a while. Probably the right thing to do, at
> this point, is to simple assume that \C-g is the same as
> quit-char. So Glenn's patch in bug#1205 is OK.
>
> After the release, we can add a `quit-char' function and
> change the Lisp code to use it.
C'mon guys, you've changed the thread.
My question is about whether I should be binding the quit character or `C-g',
and if the former, what the best way to do that is. Is the way I mentioned a
good one?
Please see my original message for the questions I'd like answers to.
I am not trying to set the quit character to something other than C-g, and I am
not interested here about the Emacs 23 changes wrt the quit character. Please
start a different thread for such stuff.
- question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/22
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21