[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: question about `quit-char'
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
RE: question about `quit-char' |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:47:39 +0900 |
Drew Adams writes:
> I thought I was asking a general, release-independent
> question. What am I missing?
An explanation of the semantics of the function you are binding.
Whether you "want" to bind to the quit character or to C-g depends on
whether or not the function has the semantics of quitting.
- Re: question about `quit-char', (continued)
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char',
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/22
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
Re: question about `quit-char', Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/10/21