[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about `quit-char'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: question about `quit-char' |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:37:39 +0200 |
> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:45:46 -0400
>
> Probably the right thing to do, at this point, is to simple assume that
> \C-g is the same as quit-char. So Glenn's patch in bug#1205 is OK.
I don't mind, but let's leave a comment there about assuming that
quit-char is C-g. It will help us when we revisit this issue later
on.
- RE: question about `quit-char', (continued)
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/22
- Re: question about `quit-char',
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
Re: question about `quit-char', Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/10/21