[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about `quit-char'
From: |
Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: |
Re: question about `quit-char' |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:01:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Chong Yidong wrote:
> "Drew Adams" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> C'mon guys, you've changed the thread.
>>
>> My question is about whether I should be binding the quit character or `C-g',
>> and if the former, what the best way to do that is. Is the way I mentioned a
>> good one?
>
> Just bind to C-g:
>
> (define-key map "\C-g" 'foo-bar)
>
> We do this all over the lisp/ tree anyway, and this isn't going to
> change before the release.
Wouldn't it be better for Drew to write a function using his own recipe
and use that? Then it would still work if the whole quit-char thing will
be implemented later.
(The crucial difference relative to your view is that Drew distribute
his libraries separately from Emacs and I believe he wants them to work
in both new and old versions of Emacs. If not there will be a lot of
extra trouble for him and the users of his libraries.)
- question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Drew Adams, 2008/10/21
- RE: question about `quit-char', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/22
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Chong Yidong, 2008/10/21
- Re: question about `quit-char', Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21