[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:29:54 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> There's also the bzr-diffstat plugin, which shows a bit more about the
> uncommitted changes than "bzr status".
diffstats are nice for VCS geeks, but what Robert needed to know was
just the files.
I've updated BzrForEmacsDevs. I ended up adding a bzr status before
each commit in each sample workflow; this may be too obtrusive, feel
free to edit. I couldn't see any good way to ensure that readers would
always notice the "vcs means never having to say you're sorry, but
..." blurb at the top.
I'll take a look at the QuickStart document after dinner.
- Re: emacs-w3m?, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, bob, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Miles Bader, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Roehler, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David Reitter, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Richard Stallman, 2010/02/28