[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:38:49 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:10:49 +0100
>
> I'm sure that doing a blind commit was deemed as an unaceptable
> practice on the CVS days too, and the checks are similar
> (`diff').
I think the problem is with the following ``feature'' of "bzr add":
Adding a file whose parent directory is not versioned will implicitly
add the parent, and so on up to the root. This means you should never
need to explicitly add a directory, they’ll just get added when you
add a file in the directory.
The second sentence explains the rationale behind this feature. But
in this case, Bob mistakenly added a single file, and that ended up
adding the whole directory. By contrast, "cvs add" is explicitly
non-recursive, AFAIR.
The question is: how do we tell users, and especially non-experienced
ones, to avoid this pitfall? Obviously, discouraging the use of
"bzr add" is a non-starter.
- Re: emacs-w3m?, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Miles Bader, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Roehler, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David Reitter, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Richard Stallman, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/28