[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:14:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> But if the same rule applies to all N commands, repeating it for every
> one of those commands introduces the same old maintainability problem as
> copy&paste.
>
> And having to annotate every Emacs package is "janitorial
> enough", methinks. There's no need to make it even more tedious.
+1
Óscar, the would-be janitor.
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional, (continued)
- RE: Making `interactive' conditional, Drew Adams, 2016/01/11
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/01/10
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), Marcin Borkowski, 2016/01/10
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/11
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/09
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/09
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/09
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/10
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/10
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/10
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx,
Óscar Fuentes <=
Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Phillip Lord, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Phillip Lord, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Andrew Hyatt, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/09
- Re: 4K Bugs, Phillip Lord, 2016/01/11
Re: 4K Bugs, Stephen Leake, 2016/01/08
Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/08