[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: org-merger questions
From: |
Kyle Meyer |
Subject: |
Re: org-merger questions |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:30:17 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
[I see that most of this message is addressed by the next post, but ...]
>> And a question:
>>
>> * Should we include the "@set DATE ..." when we replace "@include
>> org-version.inc" in Emacs's org.texi? It doesn't seem like we have
>> in the past (e.g., in Emacs's 6f66f53f65).
>
> I don’t know. I think we should be bound by the Emacs practice, not what
> was done in the last sync aeon ago. Principally, I think documents should
> be dated. I don’t know if it’s right in an Emacs context, as it carries
> its own date. idlwave.texi and elisp.texi are the only other dated texi
> files.
OK, I don't have a strong preference either way. In the future, I'll
add the date line when I replace the "@include org-version.inc" line in
the emacs-sync branch.
--
Kyle
- org-merger questions, Rasmus, 2017/06/21
- Re: org-merger questions, Kaushal Modi, 2017/06/21
- Re: org-merger questions, Bastien Guerry, 2017/06/21
- Re: org-merger questions, Rasmus, 2017/06/22
- Re: org-merger questions, Yuri Khan, 2017/06/22
- Re: org-merger questions, Kyle Meyer, 2017/06/22
- Re: org-merger questions, Kyle Meyer, 2017/06/22
- Re: org-merger questions, Rasmus, 2017/06/23
- Re: org-merger questions, Kyle Meyer, 2017/06/23
- Re: org-merger questions, Rasmus, 2017/06/23
- Re: org-merger questions,
Kyle Meyer <=
- Re: org-merger questions, Rasmus, 2017/06/23
- Re: org-merger questions, Kaushal Modi, 2017/06/25
- Re: org-merger questions, Rasmus, 2017/06/29
- Re: org-merger questions, Bastien Guerry, 2017/06/29
- Re: org-merger questions, John Wiegley, 2017/06/29
Re: org-merger questions, Kyle Meyer, 2017/06/21