[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: org-merger questions

From: Rasmus
Subject: Re: org-merger questions
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:37:33 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux)


>> I don’t know.  I think we should be bound by the Emacs practice, not what
>> was done in the last sync aeon ago.  Principally, I think documents should
>> be dated.  I don’t know if it’s right in an Emacs context, as it carries
>> its own date.  idlwave.texi and elisp.texi are the only other dated texi
>> files.  
> OK, I don't have a strong preference either way.  In the future, I'll
> add the date line when I replace the "@include org-version.inc" line in
> the emacs-sync branch.

Neither do I.  If there's an Emacs policy we should follow that.
Otherwise, I think the best thing is to use the date of the release.  But
other people may think differently.  In any case, it’s a minor issue.

Lasciate ogni speranza o voi che entrate: siete nella mani di'machellaio

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]