Re: A couple of questions and concerns about Emacs network security

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>  address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:15:13 -0700
> 
> All I'm saying is that the EWW defaults should be 
> similar to what Firefox and the other browsers use; that's just common sense.

We agree on that (provided that those browsers don't do something that
is known to be silly).

> If there are good reasons for the NSM to use different default
> settings for non-EWW connections, then of course the NSM should do
> that.

That's exactly the essence of the discussion.  In any case, the
current baseline seems to be that we do quite a lot more than the
browsers, AFAIU.