Re: A project-files implementation for Git projects

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> 1. Not having to worry about changing the API to accommodate future needs.
>> I think we should feel free to change this "API" at will.
>
> So no worry about external VC backends? Like these ones:
>
>   vc-darcs
>   vc-fossil
>   vc-hgcmd
>   vc-msg
>   vc-osc

Exactly! (note: I'm not talking about the whole API, I'm talking about
this "project files" part of the API).

> Further, normally when somebody adds an implementation of a VC action for
> some backend, it's a good thing, even if the implementation is
> imperfect. Not so in this case.

Good point,


        Stefan