On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:14 PM João Távora <
address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't understand how this can be an argument.
It wasn't an argument, it was a light-hearted comment.
> Is not exceeding the length of the longest symbol
> ever, i.e. playing to the 99% percentile, acceptable
> criteria for readability? I don't think so, personally.
Well, me, I prefer longer names to cryptic ones.