[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2019 23:07:49 +0200 |
> From: João Távora <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:37:53 +0000
> Cc: Ergus <address@hidden>, emacs-devel <address@hidden>,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
>
> > > > > "first-difference" to "completion-emphasis" and
> > > > > "common-part" to "secondary-emphasis"
> > > >
> > > > I think secondary-emphasis is not a good name, it says nothing about
> > > > its use. We should find a better name.
> > >
> > > "alternate-emphasis"?
> >
> > Same problem. How about "match-emphasis"?
>
> First, I hope we don't confuse ourselves, there is a prefix implicit
> here right? It's "completions" (or actually it should be "completion"
> singular). Apologies if I've been sloppy in using and not using
> the full name.
>
> So I'm proposing "completion-emphasis", which we seem to agree
> on
Not really, no. It suffers from the same problem: too vague to say
what it's used for.
> for _primary_ emphasis, the thing that the matching style wants
> to highlight most prominently.
>
> Regarding the second (but not necessarily secondary) face, for other
> things the completion style you are proposing "completion-match-emphasis",
> right? This is the one aliased to existing "completions-common-part".
The names "primary" and "secondary" are artificial and even
subjective. We should try to find more descriptive terms that tell
more about the uses of the face.
> So "alternate", "supporting", "secondary" or anything that expresses
> that would be my choices.
Not mine, sorry.
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, (continued)
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08