[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:43:00 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: João Távora <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:37:53 +0000
>> Cc: Ergus <address@hidden>, emacs-devel <address@hidden>,
>> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
>>
>> > > > > "first-difference" to "completion-emphasis" and
>> > > > > "common-part" to "secondary-emphasis"
>> > > >
>> > > > I think secondary-emphasis is not a good name, it says nothing about
>> > > > its use. We should find a better name.
>> > >
>> > > "alternate-emphasis"?
>> >
>> > Same problem. How about "match-emphasis"?
>>
>> First, I hope we don't confuse ourselves, there is a prefix implicit
>> here right? It's "completions" (or actually it should be "completion"
>> singular). Apologies if I've been sloppy in using and not using
>> the full name.
>>
>> So I'm proposing "completion-emphasis", which we seem to agree
>> on
>
> Not really, no.
Why didn't you object to it 1..2..six mails ago? You just said
"secondary-emphasis" is not a good name... This makes us go in circles,
Eli.
One more time: my only goal in this entire giant conversation, is for
the 'flex' style to be able to transform this match on the pattern "foo":
fabrobazor
^
`- this letter is bold by default currently
into this:
fabrobazor
^ ^ ^
`---`---`----- I want these bold by default in the future
no change to the 'basic/prefix' completion. If you don't agree to this
we can stop the discussion right here, no hard feelings, really no
problem.
Otherwise, if you do, then the only completion-related face that
currently has "bold" is completions-first-difference, which is a silly
name for this. Should I alias that to "completions-match-emphasis",
your 3-mails-ago suggestion? To something else?
Thanks in advance,
João
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, (continued)
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces,
João Távora <=
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08