[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evaluating numbers
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:28 -0500 |
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 08:55, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > A non-confusing solution to the issue “I have a code point and I’d
> > like to know which character that is, but I don’t want Emacs to spend
> > time trying all fonts to see if any of them has a glyph” could be to
> > show the Unicode name for code points greater than
> > eval-expression-print-maximum-character and less than (max-char).
> >
> > 232 (#o350, #xe8, LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE)
> > 1114109 (#o4177775, #x10fffd, <Plane 16 Private Use>)
>
> To the extent that "LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE" can't be used to
> write 232 I don't like this suggestion,
Actually ?\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE} seems to work.
- RE: evaluating numbers, (continued)
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Noam Postavsky, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Yuri Khan, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers,
Noam Postavsky <=
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Paul Eggert, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Štěpán Němec, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15