[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evaluating numbers
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:40:58 -0500 |
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 18:22, Juri Linkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ok, will use this text. But I have more doubts about using (max-char).
> What if this .el is compiled on 64-bit, where a larger value of 'max-char'
> will be saved to .elc, but loaded on 32-bit. Will it fail to load such .elc?
The value of (max-char) is independent of bitness (unlike, say,
most-positive-fixnum).
- Re: evaluating numbers, (continued)
- Re: evaluating numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2019/11/10
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/10
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/13
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/13
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers,
Noam Postavsky <=
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Yuri Khan, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Noam Postavsky, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14