[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: evaluating numbers
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:30:47 -0800 (PST) |
> > I don't see the default value there, but shouldn't it
> > be the value of (max-char)?
> >
> > If the point of printing the value as a character is
> > to print it as a character, why wouldn't the default
> > behavior be to print any possible character as a character?
>
> Please don't reopen old disputes. The default is 127.
I didn't realize there was a "dispute", old or young.
I just came across this thread. Tracing it back to
its beginning (which was only 5 days ago), I see that
the default is 127, and it was apparently previously
much bigger. Too bad, but not a big deal.
- Re: evaluating numbers, (continued)
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/08
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/09
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/09
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/09
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/09
- Re: evaluating numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2019/11/10
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/10
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/13
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/13
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Noam Postavsky, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Yuri Khan, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/14