RE: evaluating numbers

[Eli Zaretskii]

On November 12, 2019 10:05:50 PM GMT, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't see the default value there, but shouldn't it be the value of
> (max-char)?
> 
> If the point of printing the value as a character is to print it as a
> character, why wouldn't the default behavior be to print any possible
> character as a character?

Please don't reopen old disputes.  The default is 127.