[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evaluating numbers
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:14:23 +0200 |
> From: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:50:55 +0200
>
> Ok, will use this text. But I have more doubts about using (max-char).
> What if this .el is compiled on 64-bit, where a larger value of 'max-char'
> will be saved to .elc, but loaded on 32-bit. Will it fail to load such .elc?
max-char yields a 22-bit value, so it fits an integer in any Emacs
build.
> Maybe instead of (max-char) it would be better to use the value 't'
> to mean no limitation. Then to check this value explicitly
> in the implementation of 'eval-expression-print-format'.
IMO, that'd be over-engineering, since the max Unicode codepoint is
unlikely to change any time soon.
- Re: evaluating numbers, (continued)
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/10
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/12
- RE: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/13
- RE: evaluating numbers, Drew Adams, 2019/11/13
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Noam Postavsky, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Yuri Khan, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Noam Postavsky, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Paul Eggert, 2019/11/14