[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evaluating numbers
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:11:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Robert Pluim <address@hidden> writes:
> Actually, thatʼs a totally bogus reason, since this all ends up in the
> echo area, and itʼs not done for the other representations. Removed.
I thought it made sense -- you could skip to the *Messages* buffer and
kill any of the four representations and then M-: (insert C-y ) RET and
insert the character in the buffer.
If the ?\N{...} isn't there, you can't do that with the fourth
representation.
And it's also nice as a discoverability thing, since I'd guess most
people don't know about that representation.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: evaluating numbers, (continued)
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Paul Eggert, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Štěpán Němec, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/16
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/17
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/20
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/20
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/20