[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evaluating numbers
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2019 18:13:57 +0200 |
> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:55:13 +0100
>
> Eli> And, btw, why the ?\N{} part? why not just show the name?
>
> So that people can directly use it elsewhere, without having to do C-x
> 8 RET. But itʼs a minor detail, Iʼm certainly not wedded to it.
It looks a bit too much. But maybe I'm the only one bothered by that.
- Re: evaluating numbers, (continued)
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Štěpán Němec, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: evaluating numbers, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/16
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/17
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/20
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/20
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/20
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/20
- Re: evaluating numbers, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/19