[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el
From: |
Štěpán Němec |
Subject: |
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:50:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:47:11 +0100
Štěpán Němec wrote:
>> How about if instead of removing, we reword it so that it only talks
>> about the macros in the file?
>
> IMHO that would still beg the question "what's so special about this
> library that they're talking about this?", thus if not confusion, at
> least still a distraction. I don't think the fact that you can `require'
> libraries at compile time only (i.e. wrapped in `eval-when-compile'), as
> long as you only use macros or inline functions from those libraries,
> needs special mention?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(Just to be completely clear: I meant special mention in every file
concerned. I believe it _is_ mentioned in the manuals.)
--
Štěpán
- policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Tassilo Horn, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el,
Štěpán Němec <=
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28