[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:04:40 +0300 |
> From: Štěpán Němec <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:47:11 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > How about if instead of removing, we reword it so that it only talks
> > about the macros in the file?
>
> IMHO that would still beg the question "what's so special about this
> library that they're talking about this?"
It's "special" of sorts, in that it's mostly macros.
- policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Tassilo Horn, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28