[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:45:43 +0300 |
> From: Štěpán Němec <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:31:12 +0100
>
> But yes, it would at least be less confusing than the current wording,
> so if you don't want to remove the note, it would be an improvement I
> think.
Thanks, let's see what others think about this.
- policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Tassilo Horn, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el,
Eli Zaretskii <=