Re: master 1e3b0f2: Improve doc strings of project.el

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: theo@thornhill.no, philip@warpmail.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:23:42 +0300
> 
> On 19.06.2020 18:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> It's not the worst idea, but the set of "buffers belonging to the
> >> current project" should probably be the same between
> >> project-switch-to-buffer and project-kill-buffers.
> > 
> > No, not necessarily.  The purpose of the commands is different, so
> > they could start with the same basic list, but apply different filters
> > to it.
> 
> There can be subtle differences (e.g. ones stemming from 
> project-kill-buffers-skip-conditions), but the general notion of what it 
> mean to have a buffer belong to a project should be generally the same.

"Generally", yes.  But your objection above was based on the premise
that they are identical.  If they are similar, then there's no
problem.

> >> And as Philip explained, it's useful for the latter to consider many
> >> different major modes.
> > 
> > I'm talking about the former, not about the latter.
> 
> And I am talking about both.

Are we still talking about the doc string of project-switch-to-buffer?
If we are, then the latter is a separate discussion.