[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:12:38 -0500 |
Why not C-x M-u for revert-buffer? Hard to type, follows the pattern
of "undo" which revert-buffer basically is, is free, similar to the
normal pattern of Emacs bindings where M- works on something larger
than something without.
- Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
Re: Concern about new binding., martin rudalics, 2021/02/03
Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Robert Pluim, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding.,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Yuan Fu, 2021/02/03
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/03