[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
|
From: |
Juri Linkov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:03:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> Why not C-x M-u for revert-buffer? Hard to type, follows the pattern
> of "undo" which revert-buffer basically is, is free, similar to the
> normal pattern of Emacs bindings where M- works on something larger
> than something without.
Then C-x M-g would be better, since 'g' will retain its connection
with the key 'g' bound in special modes.
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding.,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Robert Pluim, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
Re: Concern about new binding., Sean Whitton, 2021/02/03