[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:21:51 +0000 |
>> Because people want to use it, and people want to make things nicer.
>
> You want a hard to type binding for revert-buffer, you already have
> that.
>
> It is not I who wanted it.
Every user can already have whatever behavior they want:
1. No global key
2. This or that global key for `revert-buffer'
3. This or that global key for `revert-buffer'
without needing to confirm
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding.,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Juri Linkov, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Robert Pluim, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04