[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:16:14 +0000 |
> Why not C-x M-u for revert-buffer? Hard to type, follows the pattern
> of "undo" which revert-buffer basically is, is free, similar to the
> normal pattern of Emacs bindings where M- works on something larger
> than something without.
What are the reasons why we need Emacs to have
_any_ default binding for `revert-buffer'?
That should be the starting point.
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/05
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding.,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Juri Linkov, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Robert Pluim, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
Re: Concern about new binding., Sean Whitton, 2021/02/03