Re: Alternative build systems

[Po Lu]

Óscar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es> writes:

> Indeed, probably less reduction is expected on Emacs' case because its
> build requirements are way simpler than Clang/LLVM (which is much more
> than a compiler, BTW.)

Its build requirements are much less simple.

In any case, a real improvement to the build system would be to make the
MS-DOS build use autoconf.  That way, we can have one build system, not
two (autoconf and GNU sed.)

Adding a third (CMake) is pointless and has nothing to do with the
matter at hand.  Qt support can be easily added without CMake.