[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2022 16:54:53 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
> At least from my experience, using C++ can make it a lot easier to
> structure large code bases, and thus make them more easily comprehendable.
> Independently of what one thinks about the language itself :-).
>
> But maybe I'm biased because I've been using C++ in commercial settings
> a lot, in large projects, and for a very long time. I'd be interested to
> hear what other contributors think about this.
I think the exact opposite, mainly because I've been using C (as opposed
to C++) in similar settings, also with large projects.
Haven't we already discussed this many times in the past?
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, (continued)
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Visuwesh, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/08/23
- Re: Alternative build systems (Was: Abysmal state of GTK build), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/23
- Re: Alternative build systems, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/08/23
- Re: Alternative build systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/23
- Re: Alternative build systems, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/08/23
- Re: Alternative build systems, Po Lu, 2022/08/23