[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Aug 2022 16:50:29 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:47:38 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Maybe someone should take another look at a possible use of Qt?
>
> I haven't kept up with Qt development at all -- but at one point, using
> Qt required using C++, I think. Is that still the case?
Yes, AFAIK. But AFAIU it should be possible to call C++ functions
from a C program, given enough glue.
> (Not that that's necessarily a deal breaker.)
Exactly. GCC already needs a C++ compiler to build, and so does GDB.
I see no problem requiring that for Emacs, if it will otherwise free
us from the GTK nightmares.
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, (continued)
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Visuwesh, 2022/08/21
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/21
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/21
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/23
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/08/23
Re: Alternative build systems (Was: Abysmal state of GTK build), Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/23
Re: Alternative build systems, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/08/23