Re: master 5b3c4004a9 2/2: Remove calls to intern with a static string from code that runs on X

[Po Lu]

Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:

> I do not jump to a conclusion, I said "apparently".  But you cannot
> share a screenshot, you do not want to share a recipe, it doesn't
> happen with emacs -Q nor with my configuration.  All that is not
> conclusive, but it points to a bug.

What "emacs -Q" does is not the only correct behavior out there, is it?

> It's a detailed advice, and it's not difficult to understand, it lists
> a few commands that the user might try to use to fix the problem.  It
> is not "littered with uses of the second person pronoun" either,
> there's a single "You" at the beginning (and I don't see what's wrong
> with that).

Once again, you (being a native English speaker) may not find it
difficult to understand, but I do, and probably many other people who
grew up where I did.

In the meantime, anyone who can read the Emacs tutorial or INSTALL can
read my version(s) of the message at least equally as well as he can
read yours.

> Let's see...
>
> $ git push
> fatal: The current branch my-new-branch has no upstream branch.
> To push the current branch and set the remote as upstream, use
>
>     git push --set-upstream origin my-new-branch

Where is the elaborate series of steps here? I see only one.

> It's not a "mundane" warning, "git clean -fdx" deletes files and they
> cannot be recovered, which is something a non-expert git user might
> not be aware of, so I don't see what's wrong with that warning.
>
> But this isn't leading anywhere, let's agree to disagree.

I still want the message changed, because so far it has totally broken
the "compilation failed; C-x `" muscle memory for me.