[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0
From: |
Thomas S. Dye |
Subject: |
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0 |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Mar 2022 08:12:54 -1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 27.1 |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:
Vikas Rawal <vikasrawal@gmail.com> writes:
What is the general view of the community about this? Is there
a
comprehensive discussion of pros and cons of each?
Prof. Kitchin himself provided a summary on why he decided to
give up on
using org-cite. See
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/issues/892
This claim in Kitchin's summary surprised me:
"It comes down to org-ref using bibtex/biblatex as the predominant
citation processor, and org-cite using CSL. These two processors
have different syntaxes, and I don't think it is possible to have
a single approach that works for both of them without making
compromises in capability."
I wonder what are the "compromises in capability" required to
support both?
I haven't found them yet, though I'm just now finishing old
projects started prior to the release of org-cite and haven't
worked through a LaTeX export project with it. My first, and so
far only, project with org-cite was for a simple html-based
presentation using CSL, and I was pleased with the results and
relative ease of setup.
All the best,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
https://tsdye.online/tsdye
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, (continued)
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Max Nikulin, 2022/03/21
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/03/20
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/03/20
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0,
Thomas S. Dye <=
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/03/20
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, John Kitchin, 2022/03/21