[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning
From: |
R.L. Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:58:17 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Fede Galland wrote:
If it's of any help, I'm attaching a MTS file that works on timidity but
not on fluidsynth.
Short answer: It doesn't work because that's not how you change tunings.
Longer answer:
The file contains a non-realtime 7E <responder ID> 08 01... "bulk tuning
dump" sysex. These should only be sent out in response to a "bulk tuning
dump request". Changing tunings in response to this message is not only
wrong, it's *insane*.
Tunings are changed with a realtime "single note tuning change" sysex: 7F
<target ID> 08 02....
See <http://www.midi.org/techspecs/midituning.php>.
I think I've managed to correct it. By hand. And I never, ever, ever
want to do that again.
The attached MIDI file might not do the right thing, but at least it'll do
something.
xxx_corrected.mid
Description: MIDI audio
- [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, Aere Greenway, 2014/10/28
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, R.L. Horn, 2014/10/29
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, Aere Greenway, 2014/10/29
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, Fede Galland, 2014/10/29
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, R.L. Horn, 2014/10/30
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, Fede Galland, 2014/10/30
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, Fede Galland, 2014/10/30
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning,
R.L. Horn <=
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, R.L. Horn, 2014/10/30
- Re: [fluid-dev] Perfect, as opposed to Tempered tuning, Aere Greenway, 2014/10/31