RE: [FR-devel] Unit Testing

[Curt Hibbs]

Yes, we should be using test::unit.

Here's something else to think about: is there any way that it would make
sense to add unit-testing support to FreeBASE as a service to plugins? Some
sort of testing framework support that would make it easier to add unit
tests to plugins. I have not really thought about this, so it may or may not
make any sense -- I just wanted to pose the question.

Curt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Rich
> Kilmer
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:39 AM
> To: FreeRIDE
> Subject: [FR-devel] Unit Testing
>
>
> All,
>
> Right now we include rubyunit in our "redist" directory.  I was thinking
> that it may be better to switch to test::unit instead since this is the
> future (and present) ruby testing package (all rubyunit devt is now
> focused on test::unit).
>
> URL of package here:
>
> http://testunit.talbott.ws/
>
> The reason for this is I am going to embark on unit tests for FreeBASE
> and I want to write them against what will be (and is now) the standard.
> Also, I want to switch the utest_databus unit tests over to test::unit.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Rich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeride-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/freeride-devel
>