gnokii-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses


From: Pawel Kot
Subject: Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:29:54 +0100

>>> address@hidden 25 February 2003 01:10:56 >>>
> There were some problems which I wanted to solve:
> * The "moving and duplicating phonebook entries" problem. When the
>   phone takes too long time to respond (it's more usual when you
>   are using m2bus) the phone retransmits its reply. gnokii isn't
>   able to suppress this message and it can cause a lot of very
mystical
>   problem. I managed to reproduce this bug: when I connected a 6110
>   to a Sun with an mbus cable gnokii --monitor segfaults in a
minute.

Sorry, I don't buy it. If I understand you correctly, you say that
phone sends the reply twice when it takes too long because we
retransmit the request. Am I correct? If so we set *incorrect* timeout
value in the initial request.

But I agree that some retransmission schema is *required* but at the
moment it is *unconditional*. And that's *bad*. Probably the fbus
and mbus drivers do need it. But other link drivers (atbus for my
knowledge so far, and 3110-fbus and cbus according to Ladis and
Osma) do NOT need it. Moreover they are broken with such policy.

And as I wouldn't care so much about nk3110 and duncall drivers
in 0.5.0 release (they were broken for "ages", but it would be
really nice to have them working properly again), but I *do* care
about atgen driver.

Try to send an SMS (quite long SMS, when the network is busy)
with AT driver and the current policy. You'll get an error and a
message sent twice when you have unluck.

pkot




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]