Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses

[BORBELY Zoltan]

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:07:44PM +0200, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Actually half of my statemachine problems would be solved by having a
> real sm_block_no_retry(). Not having one was the reason that I wrote
> expect_message() (though the real issue was not as clear for me at that
> time than it is now). So if the statemachine gets a function that never
> retries, I only need to add a sm_block_many().

IMHO moving the call of the sm_incoming_acknowledge() function into the
fb3110_message_send() or fb3110_tx_frame_send() can solve this problem.

Bye,
Bozo