Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:

    >> I agree; -v, -vv, etc might serve as alternatives.

    Tom> -vv would violate the conventions for option syntax.  --vv
    Tom> would be better, and --very-verbose would be better still.
    Tom> (If it's needed at all.)

Some programs give an argument to -v (actually, more typically to -d,
--debug-level).  Others count the number of -v's, increasing verbosity
with repetition.

-- 
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.