Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Jason McCarty <address@hidden>

    > > Doing the script myself, I've found some inconsistencies in the tla 
options:

    > I've seen some of those too, but I felt like waiting for the
    > (still not-guaranteed) option language thingy before trying to
    > improve that, since it should be possible to auto-generate most
    > of the completion script at that point.

Auto-generating completion should not depend on the "option language
thingy" -- it should depend on the output formats of `tla help', and
the outputs of various commands when given the `-h' option.

So I encourage you to try parsing those outputs, and if there are
glitches, let's fix them.

    > I agree; -v, -vv, etc might serve as alternatives.

-vv would violate the conventions for option syntax.  --vv would be
better, and --very-verbose would be better still.  (If it's needed at
all.)

-t