[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?
From: |
Ollivier Robert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla? |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:08:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
According to Samuel Tardieu:
> Roberto, any chance to use a more recent version in -STABLE? (why do
> this look like a recurring discussion?)
Because it is one? I tried to paint that bikeshed a few months ago (see
freebsd-arch) but didn't succeeded. Maybe I'll try again.
For those who don't know the story, FreeBSD has « fixed » the patch/diff
shipped with the system to deal with no-newline-at-end-of-patch, making us
completely different from everybody including the other BSD...
I fought a few months ago to revert this when I saw that pure versions of
iff/patch were needed by svn (before I saw tla's light).
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- address@hidden
Darwin snuadh.freenix.org Kernel Version 7.0.0: Wed Sep 24 15:48:39 PDT 2003
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/12/11
- config/test-suite tasks, anyone? Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/11
- Re: config/test-suite tasks, anyone? Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Scott Barron, 2003/12/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Andreas Fuchs, 2003/12/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Andreas Fuchs, 2003/12/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Ollivier Robert, 2003/12/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?,
Ollivier Robert <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/12