[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead? |
Date: |
22 Dec 2003 11:27:14 +0900 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> ... but now I notice that _without_ --link or --library, tla get will
> indeed still create a pristine tree, even if you have a greedy library
> (I'm not sure why I thought differently before!).
>
> Tom, what do you think of the following patch, to basically use
> --library by default if there's a greedy library?
Hmmm, no comments, so if anyone cares to merge:
address@hidden/tla--devo--1.2--base-0
tag of address@hidden/tla--devo--1.2--base-0
address@hidden/tla--devo--1.2--patch-1
If there's a greedy library, make get use it instead of making a pristine
-Miles
--
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
-- Walter Hines Page
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Charles Duffy, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, James Blackwell, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/21