[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
From: |
Charles Duffy |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:57:17 -0600 |
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 10:54, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> Not so. You can have rev-libs without any need to hardlink the working
> trees against them. The importat thing is to have revision libraries. If
> you manage large projects (linux kernel, gcc, [x]emacs) then you MAY want
> to save space and speed up things using hardlinks. But don't be confused
> they are not mandatory, not at all, they are a convenient feature.
As revlibs are implimented right now, hardlinks between different
revisions of the same app stored within the revlib are indeed mandatory.
Sure, the hardlinks between the revlibs and the working trees are
optional -- but those aren't what I'm talking about.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Robert Collins, 2003/12/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Charles Duffy, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Mark Thomas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?,
Charles Duffy <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, James Blackwell, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/21