[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?
From: |
Thomas Zander |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:48:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.94 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 22 December 2003 16:51, Tom Lord wrote:
> I've no doubt that a proper XML-diff/patch will produce a
> syntactically valid XML file given syntactically valid XML inputs --
> that is not the issue.
>
> The question is whether they will produce (a) valid and then (b) sane
> OO documents given valid and sane OO document inputs.
If not; then the Schema is needed to do so which will make sure it is. But I
doubt it will be needed.
Besides; the proposal was to make the merge-conflicts be handled by OOo in a
specific 'merge' widget that converts the DOM domain objects to viewable
changes so the user can select the revision (A, B, A and B, B and A) that
should be used in the resulting document.
- --
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/5xJRCojCW6H2z/QRAqM+AJ4sLsPsr9coQbZ8YJRl/0xqaiKfkwCgwGjY
Ye1zGCr3QKkFgV6msj/7loo=
=8KTy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, conrad, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?,
Thomas Zander <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Charles Duffy, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22