gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo


From: Thomas Zander
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo)
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 02:48:33 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.5.94

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 23 December 2003 20:39, Tom Lord wrote:
> there's a strong suggestion here that the output of the
> (batch) merge tool is not a document of the same type as the inputs --
> but is instead a document of the type understood by this widget.  In
> other words:
>
>         [OO doc]
>            |
>         (merge stuff in)
>            |
>            V
>         [merge report]
>            |
>          (use the merge widget)
>            |
>            V
>         [OO doc]
>
> That indirection seems undesirable to me.   I'd rather see some effort
> at avoiding it.

If so; you missed the whole point of this setup.

If you have two documents you can make a diff; when you want to do merging 
with a diff and a thirth document you would show the changes (result of 
diff) to the user to allow him more control over the merging process.

In the case of a diff(1) this is simple lines; pretty darn simple to show 
to the user.

In the case of an open office document things become a lot harder; since 
its a DOM tree with lots of interpretation that diff tool can not do.

What I proposed (please reference my email from 10:57:39 yesterday morning) 
is to read the output of the diff (not the merge, just the diff) and merge 
it in the OOo widget.

> You're just dancing around the problem and handwaving about your
> favorite technologies -- not actually solving it.

The fact that you don't follow me and that all those nice technologies are 
new and scary is not something you can blame me for (or W3C for that 
matter).
I was actually afraid you were gonna laugh at the annoying detail I put in 
the mail you replied to; instead I did not go deep enough.
I hope you will forgive me if I don't try to explain it all; at least not 
without a black-bord and us being in the same room.

- -- 
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/6PBxCojCW6H2z/QRAkN8AKD3+3lf44NGbTAUTwb2MJ5r4ttKNQCeJwCL
e5nohU6aPiov5jyWJySzSzs=
=72vp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]