[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo
From: |
Charles Duffy |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo) |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:52:01 -0600 |
Thomas,
I *think* I can see what you're getting at here. Please tell me if I'm
right.
As I understand it, you want the marked-up merged document to be viewed
in something like Mozilla, where the DOM tree is available for
inspection, presumably with something very much like a XSLT template
describing how the document is to be rendered into a format that the
tool (say, Mozilla) can actually display.
Mozilla in particular already has the ability to put a little flashing
box around everything rendered based on a subtree component, and writing
an actual merge tool for DOM tree elements based on it certainly strikes
me as a not-entirely-unreasonable problem.
An that point, the sticking point is simply having XSLT templates to
describe how to display the marked-up document format for every variety
of document the user is likely to want to merge (some of which,
presumably, are not likely to be trivially transformed into a readable
HTML representation).
Am I right?
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo),
Charles Duffy <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Momchil Velikov, 2003/12/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/19