[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0"
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0" |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:05:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Tom Lord wrote:
> Let's suppose that we want to modify or replace sort, cut, join, uniq, grep,
> awk, etc. to handle the extended field syntax of inventory and tla.
> It would be better to remove arbitrary restrictions on field contents
> than to replace one set of arbitrary restrictions with another.
But is it going to happen? I don't think so. The \0 convention for
file names is here to stay for the forseeable future.
- [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Charles Duffy, 2003/12/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 2003/12/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Florian Weimer, 2003/12/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Jan Hudec, 2003/12/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 2003/12/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0",
Florian Weimer <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 2003/12/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Colin Walters, 2003/12/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Florian Weimer, 2003/12/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 2003/12/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Brian May, 2003/12/27