[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular
From: |
Chris Mason |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:41:15 -0500 |
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 19:38, Tom Lord wrote:
> > > Is the inevitable resulting user confusion really worth it?
>
> > I think when you start munging names like this, user confusion is
> > inevitable :(
>
> That's the #1 reason why I resist changes like this. We have a
> perfectly servicable namespace right now with a clear structure.
> It's all downhill from here. And, for what? An imperfect support
> for "arbitrary names"?
>
> (The current namespace is slightly spoiled by the (historic)
> permissability of empty branch names. That was a mistake, early on.)
It's about making arch available (and easy) to use on existing
projects. Flexibility is key, it's probably enough to just allow an
arbitrary association between some name and a real arch revision.
-chris
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Robert Anderson, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Robert Collins, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/27